Top 10 Reasons Why Twitter Activity Is Declining

A few months ago, The Atlantic published an article titled A Eulogy For Twitter. In it, the authors wrote:

“Something is wrong on Twitter. And people are noticing. Its users are less active than they once were. Twitter says these changes reflect a more streamlined experience, but we have a different theory: Twitter is entering its twilight. Twitter used to be a sort of surrogate newsroom/barroom where you could organize around ideas with people whose opinions you wanted to assess. Maybe you wouldn’t agree with everybody, but that was part of the fun. But at some point Twitter narratives started to look the same. The crowd became predictable, and not in a good way.”

The authors goes on to give their hypotheses for the decline. If you are–or have ever been–active on Twitter, the article is well worth the read.

***

I can relate to the points in the article–I’m not as active on Twitter as I used to be. Nobody died and made me spokesperson for the millions of people whose Twitter activity has declined, but here’s my take on the top 10 reasons why we’re less active on Twitter:

10. Because we don’t care what inspirational quote you came upon this morning that has you motivated to attack the day (especially when inspirational quotes are the only things you tweet);

9. Because we don’t care what cutesy thing your 5 year-old said this morning. I have three kids who have said what your kid said–at least twice–and my kids are all smarter, better looking, and more athletic than your kids;

8. Because we don’t care what the celebrity who just died meant to you;

7. Because we’re watching the same freaking soccer match you are, and we can see for ourselves that some guy just scored a GOOOOAAAALLLLL!!! (oh, and, that you apparently didn’t get the memo that now that the World Cup is over, nobody cares about soccer again);

6. Because we don’t care that the guy next to you on the bus, train, or plane is annoying (look in the mirror, jerkface);

5. Because out of the 25 links you retweeted in the past two minutes, we couldn’t care less about 24 of them, and the one we did care about we saw two hours ago, when the 1,000 other people we follow tweeted the link;

4. Because we don’t care about your loony-tune [right/left]-wing political views;

3. Because we really don’t care what those social media gurus that you worship and retweet incessantly have to say (and, anyway, didn’t their 15 minutes of fame pass long ago?);

2. Because we don’t need to read tweets of you retweeting someone else’s retweets of your tweets;

And the number one reason why we’re not as active on Twitter as we used to be…

1. Because you just don’t get it that Twitter is all about you paying attention to me, not the other way around.

***

The irony here is that, as a blogger, I live and die by Twitter. No one will read this unless you retweet the link to it (that’s not entirely true–there are 7 people who will read this on LinkedIn, and 4 who will get the entire post emailed to them). One retweet from an influential tweeter could drive hundreds of hits.

***

Seriously, though, I think a lot of the decline in activity can be explained by this: People aren’t getting what they want from the platform (as much as they previously did, or had hoped they would). For me, it’s a lot harder to have meaningful conversations than it used to be. That’s what *I* want from Twitter.

The authors of The Atlantic article wrote:

“For a platform that was once so special, it would be sad and a little condescending to conclude that Twitter is simply something we’ve outgrown.”

Sad and condescending maybe, but there is a lot of truth to that. But the opposite is just as true: Twitter has outgrown us.

14 thoughts on “Top 10 Reasons Why Twitter Activity Is Declining

  1. what a great way to start MY Labor day weekend Ron. (See, it’s all about ME… lol). I can always count on you to bring sanity and clarity to the banal and overhyped twitter sphere.
    Thank YOU!

  2. Loved the top ten list! I always thought Twitter was an echo chamber for journalists and bloggers and unemployed people with too much time on their hands. The rest of the world is too busy to waste time on this medium. Will start following your blog from now on. Thanks for sharing!

  3. Twitter felt like magic in 2007-08. When someone I knew hit a 100 followers, it seemed impossible. It is still an amazing platform/invention, but like anything, the magic wears off.

    1. I know what you mean about the “magic wearing off” but I think what it is is the convergence of a wide range of objectives. In 2007-2008, we may have had a much smaller number of followers/followees, but it felt like there was more harmony/alignment of why we were there (e.g., conversation). With more users came a wide variety of objectives, some of which I, at least, find hard to tolerate.

      1. I remember the “good old days” with you guys.

        And you are right. The network was much smaller.

        Science shows we are wired to only have about 150 real relationships: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar's_number

        “Dunbar’s number is a suggested cognitive limit to the number of people with whom one can maintain stable social relationships. These are relationships in which an individual knows who each person is and how each person relates to every other person.[1][2][3][4][5][6] This number was first proposed by British anthropologist Robin Dunbar, who found a correlation between primate brain size and average social group size. By using the average human brain size and extrapolating from the results of primates, he proposed that humans can only comfortably maintain 150 stable relationships.[7] Proponents assert that numbers larger than this generally require more restrictive rules, laws, and enforced norms to maintain a stable, cohesive group. It has been proposed to lie between 100 and 250, with a commonly used value of 150.[8][9] Dunbar’s number states the number of people one knows and keeps social contact with, and it does not include the number of people known personally with a ceased social relationship, nor people just generally known with a lack of persistent social relationship, a number which might be much higher and likely depends on long-term memory size.”

        My own personal use of Twitter, and social for that matter, has radically changed as well to become more of a distribution platform for content.

        Jay Baer shares a good slide deck on this evolving use of social. http://www.convinceandconvert.com/social-media-strategy/why-it-might-be-time-to-completely-change-your-social-media-strategy/

        Sounds more like broadcast to me… just in a different channel.

        Perhaps what is old is new again.

  4. What no one seems to mention is that these social platforms took off at a time of massive unemployment and under-employment. There were a lot of marketing and media types who had time to kill, or they were turning to social media in hopes that it would save their careers or provide new ones. Then the economy started to rebound and the Twitterati found they had real work to do. Others discovered that social media was not going to be the career salvation that they hoped it would be. In other words, it’s 2014 – working people have other things to do.

  5. Great post Ron. On top of the 10 things you’ve mentioned I’ve found that with so many users that conversations tend to get too big to follow. Also the abundance of all the crap posts.

Leave a comment